Pay Scale
WBXPRESS › Forums › Pay & Allowances › Pay Scale
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 10, 2012 at 4:33 pm #75233unknownParticipant
Dear mr.Som,
It is to be mentioned that the teacher was already enrolled to enhance her qualification and moreover, she passed the part-I exam before joining. She has to complete the part-II after joining. As the part-I & part-II are the integral part of the same & one exam ; was it necessary to seek prior permission. If part-II would be the separate exam ; then question of seeking permission arise. Now suggest, will there be any positive result pursuing court-case. Remember it is not the case of enhancing degree after joining, rather, this matter is a continuous process.Friend,
Prior permission from D.I. is required specially when financial benefit for enhanced qualification is prayed, and when a leave of special kind (Study Leave) is to be sanctioned by WBBSE. If no financial benefit is prayed for, no question of prior permission from DI. Board has already sanctioned the study leave—-it’s OK.
There are three conditions for getting higher scale of pay :
a) enhancing qualification before joining,
b) completing course of study before joining, but passing only the exam after joining against prior permission,
c) enhancing the qualification after joining against prior permission.
The case under consideration does not fulfill any of the aforesaid conditions.
Now, though MA/M.Sc is seemed to be a continuous course, but the exam is held separately with separate time-table and subjects(papers). So, Board sanctions both the leaves for Part I and Part II separately. Hence, it is clear that it is not considered as a CONTINUOUS PROCESS.
To conclude, PRIOR PERMISSION is a must for any exam to sit for after joining, especially when higher scale of pay is related.
To add further, as others may suggest, if nothing works, try COURT.
Good luck.November 10, 2012 at 7:01 pm #75240unknownParticipantIn W.P. 232W/2011 dated 25 July, 2011 the teacher was NOT required to take prior permission for improvement of qualification and claim of relief when he joined the school on the 31st January,2000 after passing M.Sc. Part-I exam. He completed Part-II exam in March,2000 after obtaining permission from M.C. and study leave from WBBSE. No permission sought from D.I. as there was no G.O. in year 2000, which made the D.I.’s permission mandatory.
https://askwb.com/topic/permission-of-d-i-for-improvement-of-qualification/
Though the case which is referred by Mr. Bhowmik is similar to WP 232W/2011, yet permission of D.I. is ESSENTIAL for claiming increments as the teacher joined on 19.09.2009 and then completed M.Sc. Part-II exam. By that time G.O.593 – SE dated 27.11.2007 has taken effect and made the D.I.s permission compulsory for preferring claim of financial gain on improvement of qualification.
There are several court judgments rendered in favour of the teachers who improved qualifications through regular course without permission of D.I. before the G.O. 593 dated 27.11.2007 became effective and permission of D.I. became essential for getting financial benefit.
There is difference in time of occurrence only – before issuance of G.O. and after issuance of G.O.November 11, 2012 at 7:38 am #75250unknownParticipantShe has joined in Hons. Scale. She had completed Part. I Exam. before joined. But when she appeared in Part II Exam. then she ought to take permission from the concerned D.I. It is a little mistake, no doubt.
But the BOARD has given and allowed her study leave.
So, due to this little mistake, ( When a new employee is not aware about all the knowledge of rules. The school authority is also responded for this. Why they did not take the permission from the D.I.?) an incumbent has not gotten her financial benefit, why ?
I think, she will be good if she will go to the help of the court.November 11, 2012 at 8:23 am #75252unknownParticipantYes, you are right. I fully agree. It’s not possible for a new entrant to know all the rules and regulations. The senior teachers and/or H.M. are supposed to give proper guidance to a junior colleague every time. It is very unfortunate that a person in under compulsion to move the Court for lack of proper guidance! It’s time taking and expensive affair to establish genuine claims under Court order. But present system is such that it has become common feature today.
February 19, 2013 at 1:01 pm #76979unknownParticipantDear
sir, friend
I am an asst teacher in a H. S school. My date of joining is 26. 09. 2008. I was appointed in Hons/PG post. Before my joining I was B. Sc (Hons) in physics. I completed M. Sc part-I examination before joining the school. I took permission from MC of school to appear at the part II Exam and also sent my application to DI(SE) Barasat seeking permission. He could not respond. I appeared at the exam in 2009 and succeeded. Later I applied to DI through MC for higher scale of pay. My prayer was rejected. Again I sent a prayer for the same to DI. My prayer was forwarded to D.Se. May I be granted for higher scale of pay. If it is further reject should I go before court? Please reply. Thanking you.
Sanjay RoyFebruary 19, 2013 at 3:26 pm #76988unknownParticipantYou have strong ground!
Pls see the court’s observation in a similar case (M.A.T. 1459 of 2012 bd dated 16.10.2012, with C.A.N. 8487 of 2012): https://askwb.com/topic/permission-of-d-i-for-improvement-of-qualification/ -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.